Introduction to the Routledge World Library Edition 1886, Hugh Reginald Haweis, pg. 200-201
I chose to analyze the above summary by Mr. Haweis on pg. 200-201. Mr. Haweis wrote his article in 1886 no doubt in London. Mr. Haweis critically examined the writing and the effect of this piece of work on the literary world. Mr. Haweis examined Mrs. Shelley's ability to write and her imagination. Mr. Haweis examines the skip in details from when the "nameless demon stalks forth and is shunned by his terrified creator, what becomes of him, how he develops, why he is let go free, is not sufficiently clear," and makes his case about the lack of explanation in parts of the story. He continues to dissect the lack of detail when it comes to the anatomy in the creation of the demon but that the "exquisite descriptions" will keep the reader intrigued to the end.
I agree with the response Mr. Haweis had of the story. I too felt a lack of detail and real purpose when it came to the creation of the demon. I was left to piece it together on my own and leave my imagination to believe that a creature could be created like this, so hideous and gross, and just be left to roam. I also agree with Mr. Haweis when he said in his final paragraph that the book contains, "deep insight into the natural workings of the human heart." I found myself feeling sorry for the demon created alone to wander the earth, but at the same time wishing it would just be put to death to stop causing harm.
I think this is a very brief response to use to summarize "Frankenstein," but I can certainly refer to it in my third essay, it will not be the meatier response that I can turn to.
Image courtesy of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hugh_Reginald_Haweis.png
Link to pieces written by Hawies: http://www.harpers.org/subjects/HRHaweis
I like your reponse to this article. I had originally thought the article was a bit harsh but your thoughts on it make sense. I definitely agree that the creation of the monster could have used more detail, but, at the same time, I wonder if that wasn't done purposely. It seems that the real "horror" of the story, at least to me, is the depth and disturbing nature of the emotions the monster has and the horrific actions he takes to ensure his maker suffers unspeakably for abandoning him.
ReplyDelete