My name is Heather and I live in Sedona. Here you will get to keep up with my writing, thoughts and comments during the semester for ENG 102. Thanks for reading and commenting!
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Final Project
For my Final Project I have chosen to work with option #2. When I read both choices I just really felt I need something more modern day that I can write about and maybe even throw a movie in with it to work with.
I have chosen to focus on Cannibals. Not my first choice, but I thought this is a stretch and I should keep pushing the limits of my comfort zone. So far the text portion has been the most difficult to pin down. Finding a piece of literature that is not too childish- for teenagers to read and not too scary that it’s going to give me nightmares.
Ms. Cline suggested The Road for the text portion, but I have read that and it was so depressing that I just can’t get into it and I felt the cannibal portion was pretty small to be able to focus on. So, I have chosen The Enemy by Charlie Higson. Right now I’m about 100+ pages into it and it’s about kids surviving parents turning against them into cannibals. I’ll also use from the library The Cannibals by Iain Lawrence
I think I may add the 1976 movie Cannibal Holocaust to view as well and hopefully that will provide me with enough content to write about.
I plan to use the YC Library, but also use the link that was provided with the assignment listing some books and movies to reference. It’s going to be a difficult one, but I’ll do my best.
I hope to accomplish writing about cannibals and showing that this particular monster can be used to portray different emotions, fears, and symbols in life. I have my work cut out for me.
Image credit Amazon.
Cannibal Holocaust Movie
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Mid-Term Check In
Heather Baskins
Cline
English 102
October 19, 2011
Ms. Cline,
Consider this my mid-term check in letter. It’s been an interesting ride so far. I have so far been able to complete all of my Yavapai College education online and been happy with the results and the quality of education I am receiving.
This class has proven to be a challenge for me in a couple of different areas. First, reading poetry. Poetry has never been one of my favorite types of reading but I believe you have to experience new things in order to learn. It was a challenge to look at the poetry and try to decipher the real meaning without doing any research on the author, the subject or the time period. It took me out of my comfort zone and I had to depend upon my own imagination and ideas. It’s been difficult but I am beginning to enjoy it.
The second challenge was Frankenstein. I’ll admit- I am not the biggest fan of that book. It was hard to get into and then I just felt it was difficult to read at times. Call me too realistic I guess, but I didn’t fall for the dramatic, timeless appeal of it all. But, that’s what makes people different. I got through the reading and actually enjoyed the summaries at the end of the book and reading what others thought and were able to critique in it.
Literary analysis is a different form of writing than I have done to date at Yavapai College. I’m finding I have a thought to write but then figuring out how to make it all make sense with sources is what I spend the most time getting out and straight on paper for people to understand.
My goals for the second half of the semester are to continue with the blog posting, reading more of a variety of my class-mates posts and comments, and really figuring out how to make my Final Project make sense without too much summary.
It’s going to be an interesting remainder of the semester, but I am up for the challenge! Thanks for the feedback each week.
Sincerely,
Heather Baskins
Cline
English 102
October 19, 2011
Ms. Cline,
Consider this my mid-term check in letter. It’s been an interesting ride so far. I have so far been able to complete all of my Yavapai College education online and been happy with the results and the quality of education I am receiving.
This class has proven to be a challenge for me in a couple of different areas. First, reading poetry. Poetry has never been one of my favorite types of reading but I believe you have to experience new things in order to learn. It was a challenge to look at the poetry and try to decipher the real meaning without doing any research on the author, the subject or the time period. It took me out of my comfort zone and I had to depend upon my own imagination and ideas. It’s been difficult but I am beginning to enjoy it.
The second challenge was Frankenstein. I’ll admit- I am not the biggest fan of that book. It was hard to get into and then I just felt it was difficult to read at times. Call me too realistic I guess, but I didn’t fall for the dramatic, timeless appeal of it all. But, that’s what makes people different. I got through the reading and actually enjoyed the summaries at the end of the book and reading what others thought and were able to critique in it.
Literary analysis is a different form of writing than I have done to date at Yavapai College. I’m finding I have a thought to write but then figuring out how to make it all make sense with sources is what I spend the most time getting out and straight on paper for people to understand.
My goals for the second half of the semester are to continue with the blog posting, reading more of a variety of my class-mates posts and comments, and really figuring out how to make my Final Project make sense without too much summary.
It’s going to be an interesting remainder of the semester, but I am up for the challenge! Thanks for the feedback each week.
Sincerely,
Heather Baskins
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Frankenstein in Context
Here is my essay copied and pasted below. Glad that's done!
Heather Baskins
Cline
English 102
October 13, 2011
Frankenstein in Context
Frankenstein is a story of two similar beings- one human and one a monster. Frankenstein focuses on the main character, Victor Frankenstein, and his unfathomable loss but his extraordinary creation of a monster that he fears yet resembles at the same time. Through this monster, Victor creates a being that carries out his revenge, but it ends up being used on Victor.
Victor Frankenstein is portrayed by the author Mary Shelley, as a victim of loss and heartbreak from the beginning of this story. When he opens himself up and tells his story he begins with the loss of his own mother. He described his feelings by saying, “I need not describe the feelings of those whose dearest ties are rent by that most irreparable evil, the void that presents itself to the soul, and the despair that is exhibited on the countenance” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 25.). Victor has such a sense of grief and loss that he says it is “irreparable evil,” letting the reader know that he has no sympathy for death or grief and considers them an enemy. This evil can cause a person or creature to do things that cannot be predicted, as George Levine stated in his summary, “Evil is a deadly and fascinating mystery originating in men’s minds as an inexplicable but inescapable aspect of human goodness” (Levine, Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism, pg. 208). Because Victor feels such loss and pain it could lead him to find a way to release his anger towards this evil which will then seek revenge against him.
Victor’s creation of a monster is an outlet for his revenge. When Victor first creates his monster he is pleased with the beauty but then his feelings of fear and the ugliness within got the best of him:
“The different accidents of life are not so changeable, as the feelings of human nature. I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life in an inanimate body. For this I deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 34.)
From the beginning of the monster’s creation, he was cursed, treated as an outcast and not wanted by anyone. Knight’s Quarterly says of Frankenstein’s creation of him, “he heaps on him all sorts of abuse and contumely for his ugliness, which was directly his work, and for his crimes to which his neglect gave rise” (Anonymous, Knight’s Quarterly, pg. 199). Victor creates this monster and instead of destroying and preventing the death of his loved ones, he allows the creature to roam free on his own to figure the world out alone. Victor lives in fear of the creature and knows he has power but does not stop him. This lack of response shows Victor is willing to let this creature roam free and carry out his plans, are they his plans or Victor’s thoughts being put into action?
Victor ends up alone because of the evil actions his monster has achieved. Victor’s creation learns how to speak, read, and be clever and conniving. He uses his skills to seek revenge on his own creator, killing those closest to him. Victor will not
create a partner for his monster, and the monster will not let Victor live in wedded happiness with his partner. Victor knows Elizabeth his beloved will not survive, but he does nothing to stop it because he and the monster are destined to be alone- with only each other. Victor in fact cried out in the cemetery when visiting the graves of his brother, William, his beloved Elizabeth and his Father, “I swear to pursue the daemon, who caused this misery until he or I shall perish in mortal conflict” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 140). The pursuit of the monster continues for Victor and it seems this is what both beings are living for. As George Levine says in his summary, “they increasingly resemble and depend upon each other so that by the end Frankenstein pursues his own monster, their positions reversed, and the monster plants clues to keep Frankenstein in pursuit” (Levine, Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism, pg. 209). Victor continues on his solo journey in pursuit and not knowing what the outcome will be.
Victor and the monster continue in their pursuit, but the end is disenchanting. Victor continues in pursuit of the monster, follows his clues, and risks his life to find him. In the end Victor dies in a peaceful fashion, “he pressed my hand feebly, and his eyes closed for ever, while the irradiation of a gentle smile passed away from his lips” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 152). He died without capturing, killing, or stopping his monster. His monster pays him one last visit on the ship when he has taken his final breath and knows that his days are numbered as well and he has no reason to live:
“But soon,” he cried, with sad and solemn enthusiasm, “I shall die, and what I now feel be no longer felt. Soon these burning miseries will be extinct. I shall ascend my funeral pile triumphantly, and exult in the agony of the torturing flames. The light o that conflagration will fade away; my ashes will be swept into the sea by the winds. My spirit will sleep in peace; or if it thinks, it will not surely think thus. Farewell.”’
The monster has no further reason to live and Victor could not keep up the chase. The end result is anticlimactic and readers are left feeling disappointed and left with no real purpose to the story. As Hugh Reginald Haweis said in his summary:
“The general conception of a creature created non-natural by the appliance of art and science, and impelled into crime after crime simply by a despairing contest with a world into which he should never have been introduced at all, is certainly powerful; but the tale of horror is unrelieved by any real poetical justice, and the moral threat- if there is any- is vague and indeterminate” (Haweis, Introduction to the Routledge World Library Edition, pg. 200).
Victor and the monster never met to battle or accomplish a purpose in the end or even throughout their journey. Ultimately, Victor died from his pursuit and the monster gave up living, one can assume, because of the lack of pursuit.
To end with, Frankenstein is a story of two similar beings- one human and one a monster. Victor and the monster both suffered loss and sought revenge for the evil they faced. Victor’s creation of the monster can be perceived as his own outlet for revenge- against others and ultimately turning on himself. Victor ends up alone because of the monsters’ actions and pursuing his own creation. The end result is disenchanting, Victor dies from his efforts to chase and catch his own creation, and his creation in the end gives up because of Victor’s absence. Victor was surrounded by people who loved and cared for him, but he seemed to thrive and feel the most emotion only when he was abandoned and left alone. The monster on the other hand was so in need of companionship that he was willing to kill for it. Victor and the monster were one in the same- what one lacked the other had but still could not be complete in the end. They were two similar beings- one human and one a monster.
Works Cited
Anonymous. Knight’s Quarterly. 1824. Print.
Hawes, Hugh Reginald. Introduction to the Routledge World Library Edition.
1886. Print.
Levine, George. Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism. 1973. Print.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1996. Print.
Heather Baskins
Cline
English 102
October 13, 2011
Frankenstein in Context
Frankenstein is a story of two similar beings- one human and one a monster. Frankenstein focuses on the main character, Victor Frankenstein, and his unfathomable loss but his extraordinary creation of a monster that he fears yet resembles at the same time. Through this monster, Victor creates a being that carries out his revenge, but it ends up being used on Victor.
Victor Frankenstein is portrayed by the author Mary Shelley, as a victim of loss and heartbreak from the beginning of this story. When he opens himself up and tells his story he begins with the loss of his own mother. He described his feelings by saying, “I need not describe the feelings of those whose dearest ties are rent by that most irreparable evil, the void that presents itself to the soul, and the despair that is exhibited on the countenance” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 25.). Victor has such a sense of grief and loss that he says it is “irreparable evil,” letting the reader know that he has no sympathy for death or grief and considers them an enemy. This evil can cause a person or creature to do things that cannot be predicted, as George Levine stated in his summary, “Evil is a deadly and fascinating mystery originating in men’s minds as an inexplicable but inescapable aspect of human goodness” (Levine, Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism, pg. 208). Because Victor feels such loss and pain it could lead him to find a way to release his anger towards this evil which will then seek revenge against him.
Victor’s creation of a monster is an outlet for his revenge. When Victor first creates his monster he is pleased with the beauty but then his feelings of fear and the ugliness within got the best of him:
“The different accidents of life are not so changeable, as the feelings of human nature. I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life in an inanimate body. For this I deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 34.)
From the beginning of the monster’s creation, he was cursed, treated as an outcast and not wanted by anyone. Knight’s Quarterly says of Frankenstein’s creation of him, “he heaps on him all sorts of abuse and contumely for his ugliness, which was directly his work, and for his crimes to which his neglect gave rise” (Anonymous, Knight’s Quarterly, pg. 199). Victor creates this monster and instead of destroying and preventing the death of his loved ones, he allows the creature to roam free on his own to figure the world out alone. Victor lives in fear of the creature and knows he has power but does not stop him. This lack of response shows Victor is willing to let this creature roam free and carry out his plans, are they his plans or Victor’s thoughts being put into action?
Victor ends up alone because of the evil actions his monster has achieved. Victor’s creation learns how to speak, read, and be clever and conniving. He uses his skills to seek revenge on his own creator, killing those closest to him. Victor will not
create a partner for his monster, and the monster will not let Victor live in wedded happiness with his partner. Victor knows Elizabeth his beloved will not survive, but he does nothing to stop it because he and the monster are destined to be alone- with only each other. Victor in fact cried out in the cemetery when visiting the graves of his brother, William, his beloved Elizabeth and his Father, “I swear to pursue the daemon, who caused this misery until he or I shall perish in mortal conflict” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 140). The pursuit of the monster continues for Victor and it seems this is what both beings are living for. As George Levine says in his summary, “they increasingly resemble and depend upon each other so that by the end Frankenstein pursues his own monster, their positions reversed, and the monster plants clues to keep Frankenstein in pursuit” (Levine, Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism, pg. 209). Victor continues on his solo journey in pursuit and not knowing what the outcome will be.
Victor and the monster continue in their pursuit, but the end is disenchanting. Victor continues in pursuit of the monster, follows his clues, and risks his life to find him. In the end Victor dies in a peaceful fashion, “he pressed my hand feebly, and his eyes closed for ever, while the irradiation of a gentle smile passed away from his lips” (Shelley, Frankenstein, pg. 152). He died without capturing, killing, or stopping his monster. His monster pays him one last visit on the ship when he has taken his final breath and knows that his days are numbered as well and he has no reason to live:
“But soon,” he cried, with sad and solemn enthusiasm, “I shall die, and what I now feel be no longer felt. Soon these burning miseries will be extinct. I shall ascend my funeral pile triumphantly, and exult in the agony of the torturing flames. The light o that conflagration will fade away; my ashes will be swept into the sea by the winds. My spirit will sleep in peace; or if it thinks, it will not surely think thus. Farewell.”’
The monster has no further reason to live and Victor could not keep up the chase. The end result is anticlimactic and readers are left feeling disappointed and left with no real purpose to the story. As Hugh Reginald Haweis said in his summary:
“The general conception of a creature created non-natural by the appliance of art and science, and impelled into crime after crime simply by a despairing contest with a world into which he should never have been introduced at all, is certainly powerful; but the tale of horror is unrelieved by any real poetical justice, and the moral threat- if there is any- is vague and indeterminate” (Haweis, Introduction to the Routledge World Library Edition, pg. 200).
Victor and the monster never met to battle or accomplish a purpose in the end or even throughout their journey. Ultimately, Victor died from his pursuit and the monster gave up living, one can assume, because of the lack of pursuit.
To end with, Frankenstein is a story of two similar beings- one human and one a monster. Victor and the monster both suffered loss and sought revenge for the evil they faced. Victor’s creation of the monster can be perceived as his own outlet for revenge- against others and ultimately turning on himself. Victor ends up alone because of the monsters’ actions and pursuing his own creation. The end result is disenchanting, Victor dies from his efforts to chase and catch his own creation, and his creation in the end gives up because of Victor’s absence. Victor was surrounded by people who loved and cared for him, but he seemed to thrive and feel the most emotion only when he was abandoned and left alone. The monster on the other hand was so in need of companionship that he was willing to kill for it. Victor and the monster were one in the same- what one lacked the other had but still could not be complete in the end. They were two similar beings- one human and one a monster.
Works Cited
Anonymous. Knight’s Quarterly. 1824. Print.
Hawes, Hugh Reginald. Introduction to the Routledge World Library Edition.
1886. Print.
Levine, George. Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism. 1973. Print.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1996. Print.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Summary of a Critical Response
Introduction to the Routledge World Library Edition 1886, Hugh Reginald Haweis, pg. 200-201
I chose to analyze the above summary by Mr. Haweis on pg. 200-201. Mr. Haweis wrote his article in 1886 no doubt in London. Mr. Haweis critically examined the writing and the effect of this piece of work on the literary world. Mr. Haweis examined Mrs. Shelley's ability to write and her imagination. Mr. Haweis examines the skip in details from when the "nameless demon stalks forth and is shunned by his terrified creator, what becomes of him, how he develops, why he is let go free, is not sufficiently clear," and makes his case about the lack of explanation in parts of the story. He continues to dissect the lack of detail when it comes to the anatomy in the creation of the demon but that the "exquisite descriptions" will keep the reader intrigued to the end.
I agree with the response Mr. Haweis had of the story. I too felt a lack of detail and real purpose when it came to the creation of the demon. I was left to piece it together on my own and leave my imagination to believe that a creature could be created like this, so hideous and gross, and just be left to roam. I also agree with Mr. Haweis when he said in his final paragraph that the book contains, "deep insight into the natural workings of the human heart." I found myself feeling sorry for the demon created alone to wander the earth, but at the same time wishing it would just be put to death to stop causing harm.
I think this is a very brief response to use to summarize "Frankenstein," but I can certainly refer to it in my third essay, it will not be the meatier response that I can turn to.
Image courtesy of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hugh_Reginald_Haweis.png
Link to pieces written by Hawies: http://www.harpers.org/subjects/HRHaweis
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Writing and Revision
Revising or just improving grammar mistakes- what do I do? For this particular assignment- our second Essay I am choosing to revise what I wrote. If I only changed the revisions in the grammar I wouldn't be making the most of the corrections and advice that I received.
Usually when I have to write something, which is typically a press release, I have at least one more person read it. I am hoping when I ask someone to read it that they proof not just the grammar but the writing itself. I need to know that what I think makes sense, actually does.
Once when I asked someone to read a press release I had written they handed it back to me and told me it didn't make sense. They said, "read it out loud and you'll see why." Which is what I did and realized I was writing it so fast when I was thinking that I had skipped words and it didn't come out right. Now I try to do that and slow down the process making sure that it all makes sense.
In Essay #2, sure I have some grammar issues but one main part I need to revise is my opening paragraph. It does not have a sentence that really grabs the reader at the start. Because of this I am going to revise it.
Another thing my Essay #2 needs in the revision is for me to focus on how the language ties in with the purpose of the poem. As one reader of my Essay #2 said- in the end you did all the work to define the language used and they were left feeling, "so what," and that can't be.
Revising can be hard, but if I want this essay to be better, it needs to be revised. This link to a Quick Five Step Guide to Revising and Editing was a useful one to help in my process: http://beabetterwriternow.com/2009/05/quick-five-step-guide-to-revising-and-editing/.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


